Talk:Shi: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Nvm I found it. It's not a fantastic source but its what I used. [https://www.romajidesu.com/dictionary/meaning-of-%E3%82%B7%E3%82%A4.html Here is the source I used.] [[User:Amaterasu|Amaterasu]] ([[User talk:Amaterasu|talk]]) 16:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | ::Nvm I found it. It's not a fantastic source but its what I used. [https://www.romajidesu.com/dictionary/meaning-of-%E3%82%B7%E3%82%A4.html Here is the source I used.] [[User:Amaterasu|Amaterasu]] ([[User talk:Amaterasu|talk]]) 16:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
::: and yeah I did misread it as "beach" instead of "beech". Oops! [[User:Amaterasu|Amaterasu]] ([[User talk:Amaterasu|talk]]) 16:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | ::: and yeah I did misread it as "beach" instead of "beech". Oops! [[User:Amaterasu|Amaterasu]] ([[User talk:Amaterasu|talk]]) 16:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
::Thanks. Looks like that source was poorly worded – Castanopsis is not a beech tree, though it is in the beech family. ~ [[User:Celtic Minstrel|Celtic Minstrel]] ([[User talk:Celtic Minstrel|talk]]) 18:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:50, 12 February 2024
Etymology
What's the source for the etymology? I can't find anything on Wiktionary to support it; the Japanese for "beach" appears to be "buna", and it's hard to imagine that "beach tree" wasn't a typo. ~ Celtic Minstrel (talk) 14:24, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- I researched for it on the day she was announced very quickly, and didn't use any actual viable sources (searching for it now, I can't even find the source I used back then). I meant for it to be temporary until someone with more viable sources found the proper meaning. Since it wasnt changed, I kind of assumed that it was accepted. Amaterasu (talk) 16:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Nvm I found it. It's not a fantastic source but its what I used. Here is the source I used. Amaterasu (talk) 16:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Looks like that source was poorly worded – Castanopsis is not a beech tree, though it is in the beech family. ~ Celtic Minstrel (talk) 18:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)